
Cannabis Scheduling: Then vs. Now How a 1970s Policy Still Shapes Cannabis Today By Justice | Elevated Club NYC
- Elevated Club NYC

- Jan 7
- 3 min read
Cannabis didn’t always carry the stigma it does in U.S. law. In fact, for much of American history, cannabis was used medicinally and industrially. But one decision in the 1970s reshaped everything — and we’re still feeling the effects today.
This is the story of how cannabis went from a Schedule I substance to a plant now on the brink of federal reclassification — and why that matters for consumers, patients, and the legal market.
The 1970s: When Cannabis Was Classified as Schedule I
In 1970, the U.S. government passed the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). Under this law, cannabis was placed into Schedule I, the most restrictive category.
Schedule I substances are defined as:
Having a high potential for abuse
Having no accepted medical use
Lacking safety under medical supervision
Cannabis was grouped alongside heroin and LSD — despite its long history of medicinal use and relatively low toxicity.
Politics Over Science
The classification happened during the early years of the War on Drugs, a time driven heavily by political fear rather than medical evidence.
In 1972, a federal commission known as the Shafer Commission recommended decriminalizing cannabis, concluding it was less harmful than alcohol. That recommendation was ignored.
The result?
Federal prohibition
Severe criminal penalties
Minimal research access
Decades of stigma
1980s–1990s: Reinforcing the Narrative
Throughout the ’80s and ’90s, cannabis remained Schedule I.
During this period:
Mandatory minimum sentencing increased
Arrests surged, disproportionately impacting Black and Latino communities
Scientific research remained tightly restricted
Ironically, while cannabis was still said to have “no medical value,” the U.S. government quietly acknowledged the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids through patents and limited research allowances.
The contradiction was clear — but the law didn’t budge.
2000s–2010s: The Shift Begins
Public opinion started to change.
States began legalizing medical cannabis, followed by adult-use legalization in places like Colorado and California. International research expanded, and medical patients increasingly spoke out about real benefits.
In 2018, the FDA approved Epidiolex, a cannabis-derived medication used to treat epilepsy — directly contradicting the Schedule I claim of “no accepted medical use.”
Yet federally, cannabis remained Schedule I.
This created a strange reality:
Legal at the state level
Illegal at the federal level
Businesses taxed heavily
Consumers navigating inconsistent rules
The 2020s: Reclassification Era
Fast forward to today.
In 2024, the U.S. Department of Justice formally proposed moving cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III.
What Schedule III Means
Schedule III substances:
Have accepted medical use
Have a moderate to low risk of dependence
Include drugs like ketamine and testosterone
For cannabis, this would mean:
Federal acknowledgment of medical value
Easier access for scientific research
Major tax relief for legal cannabis businesses (ending IRS 280E)
A shift away from viewing cannabis as a top-tier dangerous drug
What it doesn’t mean (yet):
Full federal legalization
Complete removal from drug scheduling
Instant nationwide consistency
Then vs. Now: A Clear Contrast
Then (1970s):
Cannabis treated as a dangerous narcotic
Research suppressed
Criminalization prioritized
Now (2020s):
Cannabis increasingly recognized for medical and wellness use
Science driving policy changes
Regulation replacing punishment
Why This Matters at Elevated Club NYC
At Elevated Club NYC, we believe education beats fear and responsibility beats misinformation.
Understanding cannabis scheduling isn’t just about policy — it’s about:
Knowing why stigma exists
Understanding why regulation matters
Supporting a transparent, tested, and legal market
Making informed choices as consumers
Cannabis isn’t harmless — but it also isn’t the villain it was once made out to be. The truth lives in balance.





Comments